Purl & Java

07/16/07

This is the truth?

Filed under: Cultural Commentary, Art — kristy @ 11:43:51 am

(Hat Tip: David Piske)

Is this true or not?

I like David's title for it, "The Backwards Logic of Redemption," because without redemption this is just a cool trick with words with nothing to back it up.

Comments, Trackbacks, Pingbacks

The URI to TrackBack this entry is:

This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots.

Please enter the characters from the image above. (case insensitive)

  1. I think it is true. Actually it may even be true in both directions depending on what it means to turn things upside down. The first time through seems to express something like all the fears I've heard connected to Conservative Christianity. The problem as I see it is that embracing fear is sort of like rejecting God. So, in a way, those who hold to those fears and turn things upside-down by embracing evil as if it were good don't have the Lord as their God. Of course it's easy to see how it's true in reverse, loving our neighbors as God has loved us has always seemed crazy and has always had incredible power.

    Jon

    Comment by Jon [Visitor] · http://jonatwabash.blogspot.com — 07/26/07 @ 04:25

  2. Actually it may even be true in both directions depending on what it means to turn things upside down.

    I think that's the key question here. What is turning it upside down?

    Comment by kristy [Member] · http://kristy.fremde.org — 07/26/07 @ 09:45

  3. Perhaps "turning it upside down" has multiple meanings that are true.

    Jon

    Comment by Jon [Visitor] · http://jonatwabash.blogspot.com — 07/26/07 @ 22:25

  4. How very Anglican of you! ;-)

    But I joke because you're probably right.

    Comment by kristy [Member] · http://kristy.fremde.org — 07/26/07 @ 22:28

  5. lol, and here I thought I was just reapplying an old rule of biblical exegesis used by people like Augustine when they wanted to do what seems to me like more playful exegesis. Hmm, actually borrowing liberally from older sources is probably pretty Anglican as well.

    Jon

    Comment by Jon [Visitor] · http://jonatwabash.blogspot.com — 07/27/07 @ 20:52

  6. So, then, my comment has multiple meanings.

    ...

    Cool!

    Comment by kristy [Member] · http://kristy.fremde.org — 07/27/07 @ 23:02

Leave a comment

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small>


Options:
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email & url)

powered by  b2evolution Credits: skin converting | blog tool | framework | hosting
This skin features a CSS file originally designed for WordPress (See design credits in style.css).
Original design credits for this skin: Dave Shea & Matthew Mullenweg
In order to ensure maximum compatibility with WP CSS files, most b2evolution features that do not exist in WP are hidden from this generic wpc_* skin.